Radicalization and Social Globalization

Social Globalism and Radicalization  


I remember all of the protests of the 1960s and 70s, the anti war protests, Kent State, woman’s rights protests, pro choice protests, these protests were mostly anti family, free sex, protests, under the cover of woman’s rights, much like today’s free capitalism under the cover of globalism.

Of all the protests during this time, there was only one for genuine civil rights that was Martin Luther King, and the Civil Rights Movement, the rest were protests of ideological greed. The proof of this; no one today is disputing the Civil Rights Movement of Martin Luther King, anyone who  defends Civil Rights can recognize human beings as ends in themselves.  These other movements never compare themselves to the Civil Rights Movement. They simply can’t.  They are ideological and cannot establish that a human being is an end in them self. You would think by aligning themselves with the Civil Rights movement they would score a big public relations victory; but to do so is to equate Black African Americans and everyone ells to be nothing more than the equivalency of specific behaviour.

When we begin to define race, human beings, human rights according to specific behaviour or stereo- types we are entering a very repulsive ideology. The use of human behaviour as criterion for defining race and human rights comes out of the theology of Racism, Social Darwinism, Aryan supremacy and Nazism. The current same sex crusade is really the flip side of this theology; the other side of the same coin. The construction of special human rights will always create the denial of other human rights, this works just as well as the construction of discrimination will always create other special human rights. When you consider what it will do for children and the rest of us, you would realize they are seeking predatory rights. The issues are still as hot as ever after 40 years and polarize the people. The opposition to this type of non- objective ideological discrimination is never going to go away; it is becoming more articulate and growing around the world.

Before I continue with the world situation of today I need to prove my point from history, then I will continue with the present time.

Historically: to put social globalism into a historic perspective I will begin  with the Greeks. The Greek Hellenisation of the world.  After Alexander the Great died in 323 B.C.E. at Babylon, the conquered empire was divided up into 3 kingdoms. Ptolemy kingdom included Egypt and parts of the Middle East, Seleucid Kingdom held the Old Persian Empire and Antigonus held Macedonia and Greece. By now the imperial Greeks were no longer the Greeks of the democratic city states, as the different approaches to government will show.

The state of Judaea which had just been reinstated by the Persian King fell into the hands of the Ptolemy King from Alexandria in Egypt. The Ptolemy approach to government was to allow each state to have internal self government and the imperial government would control taxation, defence and foreign affairs. This system worked well for Judaea and the state flourished, not withstanding social division developing through the influence of Hellenism and political divisions form the influences from the Seleucid Empire.

The Seleucid Empire took a very different approach to government. It became a government of micro management, building new cities on the Greek model and enforcing Hellenization of the people.  Emperor worship was introduced to religion.  Their purpose was a unified Hellenistic tyranny.

After a hundred years of relative peace for Judaea there was war between the Seleucid and Ptolemy. Judaea became part of the Seleucid Empire. Obviously this signals a shift in policy toward Judaea however Judaea was promised the same self government. This lasted about 25 years. Then the government was changed with new administration in line with the Seleucid elitist tyranny. Temple funds were taken for the state treasury from the Temple at Jerusalem. Obviously this would trigger protest but much worse was to come.

The intention of this quiet revolution was to transform Judaea into a Seleucid Greek state.  Seleucid policy was to synthesize all Idolatry, including Emperor Worship into one religion.  Jewish religion would be required to synthesize with it; into this mush pot. This was easy for all the other pagan Idolatrous states. When there is no objective truth anything and everything becomes believable. However, this could never work for the Jewish State.  Judaea as a State, as well as its religion, is founded on the same constitutional principle of the Supremacy of God and the rule of law. Here, instead of emperor worship the emperor was subject to the rule of objective law.  In Judaea every man was his fellow’s equal under God, in civil and political rights.

Antiochean Decree:  In the year 167 B.C.E. during military occupation of Jerusalem the image of Zeus was set up in the Temple and the Antiochean Decree was made.  The decree forbade compliance with the laws of the Torah, including observance of the Sabbath, and circumcision on the pain of death. Jews everywhere were compelled to take part in idolatrous worship and to offer up sacrifices on the altars erected for the purpose. There were Jews that submitted, others fled to the desert and many suffered martyrdom rather than violate the Torah.

Beginning in 166 B.C.E. we have the Maccabean wars, where a small rebel army of Jews crushed the Seleucid Greek army in several battles, by 140 B.C.E. Judaea once again was an independent state, until the Romans came. Then we have this same story all over again.

What is important to note, is the purpose of this war and what the Seleucids were fighting against. They were fighting against the constitutional principle of the Supremacy of God and the rule of Law, human equality and civil liberty. The Maccabean war was the first civil liberties war the world has known.

If any of the Greeks at this time were capable of objective thinking, and critical thinking, they might have realized what they were fighting against was the constitutional principle that the Democratic Greece City States where looking for and never fond. It was this principle for justice that could have made a democratic federation possible; but now it is 200 years too late. This principle was not rediscovered until 1,600 years later, with the Protestant Reformation.  It is this reformation that made the modern democratic state possible, also the emancipation of the Jews, and eventually an end to slavery and racism. There may be a separation between Church and State as institutions, but there is no separation between government, politics, religion, and conscience, there never was and there never will be.

How then are we doing today in our modern democracies under the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law; with our Human Rights; Civil Rights and our Civil Liberty?  Where every man is his fellow’s equal?

With the sexual revolution of the 1960s – 70s, here in Canada the abortion law was changed, that abortion was allowed for reasons of life and health of the mother, on the consent of two medical doctors. We objected to the word health.  The word health could mean anything including a person’s preferences.  We said it was the slippery slope to abortion on demand. We were ridiculed as paranoid idiots; this would never happen. Now 45 years later what do we have? We have no abortion law at all; abortion is legal in Canada up until birth. There is statistical evidence of infanticide as well.  If you want to kill your baby come to Canada, it is legal.

Now with same sex marriage, parenting and family, why did they just come with it recently?  Why not at the beginning of the sexual revolution; they already had it in mind then? The answer is, it could not be entered into society under any pretense. The meaning of marriage as a civil institution first had to be destroyed.

The only reason we have civil marriage and family status is for its property as a natural organism that reciprocates to reproduce.  It is for this reason, and this reason only, the community and state have an interest in it; survival and continuity depend on it.  Then, because it is a natural organism it has 100% objective consent from the community. Any other relationships whatever they may be, and though they may exist, are of no interest to the community, and therefore can never demand consent; they have no claim to public consent, and can only achieve subjective consent; objective consent is imposable . Force of law can only achieve a superficial feigned consent.  However when much of society losses its objectiveness and marriage comes to mean nothing more than a temporary  adult entertainment contract then they, the revolutionaries think they have created the right conditions for same sex marriage, parenting and family; they have no sense for consequences neither history, for them everything is entertainment.  What is at issue; human subjectivism is to replace human objectivism.  Moral relativism is to become our State Religion, our Government and our Justice. It is to replace the moral imperative.

Do I approve of homosexuality?  To come anywhere near to approval; we first would need to approve of adultery, fornication, anal intercourse and oral sex. None of these behavioural activities are gender specific.  These activities are the cause of viral diseases, cancer, reduced life expectancy, dysfunctional and broken families and traumatized children. Who in their right mind would approve of all this? Having said this, I don’t think I need to have an opinion on homosexuality.  Human sexuality does not come in multiples. There is only one, “human sexuality” and it, like all other aspects of human life is fraught with problems, homosexuality is only one of them.

Artificial construction of Human Rights:  Behavioural human rights are the construction of elitism for the purpose of persecution with the pretense of human rights. This is much like the Soviet system where they persecuted people with the pretense of workers’ rights.

How genuine are these constructed rights?   If homosexuality would be true to itself there would be no problem. But why would they feign themselves to be a natural organism that reciprocates to reproduce as with same sex marriage, parenting and family?   There are not many, and I don’t know of any, Black African Americans who make themselves white as if this would be the only means to equality. Homosexuals have all the human rights as everyone ells, they only need to be true to themselves and take it for what it is.

To cast it in the light of philosophy, from Emanuel Kant, I would say, a person may be as homosexual as they are or want, but they are that to their own maxim, as end in themselves before God. It can never extend to the objective priori, to be willed as a universal moral law. To do so, as we are doing, is a tyranny on the human conscience.  You may just as well make a law that we all must take Mass. Or all of us including Jews must eat pork. These – at one time were real laws in the middle ages for some states in Europe. The modern sexual revolution is becoming an icon of history in this same category.

Children’s Rights:   Apart from abortion and infanticide being legal, we now also have same sex parenting to further destroy the human rights of children. A child is procured from a mother and father, it therefore also follows that a child has a natural inclination to a mother and father. A right to a mother and father is a natural biological human right. What more human rights can you deny children? This is to make children into property, a commercial product. By every definition it is slavery. If you don’t think it is then you need to prove that a child procured from a mother and father now chooses same sex parents.  These children have a right to sue for wrongful parenting.  All of your arguments that same sex parenting does not harm children have all been heard before; 200 years ago in the defence of racist slavery.

Construction of the new anti-Semitism: It is becoming increasingly clear that the established authority in government and the courts don’t want us, and are denying us effective citizenship.  They do not want us as doctors, we might refuse abortion referrals. We are not wanted as teachers, we might teach objective thinking, and critical thinking instead of socially correct ideological thinking. We are not wanted as marriage commissioners; we are disallowed to refuse same sex marriage.  This new form of anti-Semitism is not just directed against Jews but anyone who is capable of objective thinking or even critical thinking; but then anti-Semitism has always been anti-objectiveness.  We are beginning to look like the new Hebrews of the twenty first century in this world; it is our enemies who are make us be this.

The sexual revolution is becoming to look more and more like the Antochean Decree.  It has exactly the same spirit and intention.

The sexual revolution was a change in Ideology (religion), ideological Government  appointing Ideological judges to the Supreme Court effectively bypasses democracy to enforce its religion/ideology, then it is the hope, that through ideological/judicial manipulation and coercion in due time society and government will reflect the ideological/religious ideals of the elite who appointed the judges.  We think we are being governed by a democratic government, but in truth we are bring ruled by Ideological/Religious decree, and this new religion again is one of those ancient religions that has no use for objective truth,  then it follows neither human rights, civil liberty or Democracy.  All of this is being used as a pretext to an ideological end.  This religion/ideology is no guardian of the secular state.

Martin Luther King said in his famous speech “I have a dream” that he “looked forward to the day that his daughter would be judged on her character and not the colour of her skin”.  Then according to the ideological authorities of today Martin Luther King got it all wrong, now it is the character that has the human rights not human beings.

In the year 1560 A.D.E, William of Orange (the silent) in the council chamber before Margret of Parma governor of the Dutch Provinces for her brother King Philip II of Spain, said “this cannot continue! I am Roman Catholic, but I do not find it acceptable for the King to rule the conscience of his people and deprive them of the freedom to believe and worship God in the way they believe to be right”. I can say the same thing; for much different circumstances but on the same principal, with the same intention and consequences. “This cannot continue! I support the secular state, but I do not find it acceptable for the Government to rule the conscience of its people and deprive them the freedom of conscience with full effective citizenship. Anything less than objective is unacceptable and intolerable in the secular state. It creates elitism, denies freedom of conscience and thereby deprives effective citizenship.

William of Orange (the silent) believed that Roman Catholics and Protestants could live side by side as equally effective citizens of the State. If only Justice would be objective! If only the rule of law would be objective!  However King Philip was totally obsessed with Ideological/religious correctness that he was wholly incapable of any objective thinking.

The King’s reaction is quite understandable, when you consider what this all implies. Objective justice and the objective rule of law imply “The Supremacy of God and the rule of Law”. It would recognize the moral imperative. This would be a compete surrender to the Jews, Jewish religion,  and as the protestants understood it a return to the Bible; and thereby be a total rejection of the supremacy of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church, as well as himself as the absolute ruler. This leaves the Roman Catholic Church standing as a pagan adaptation to Jewish religion; that mush pot of all pagan religions that the Seleucid Greeks were unable to achieve in Judaea in the face of the Maccabean revolt. It also becomes quite understandable why William of Orange became protestant and renounced his Roman Catholic Religion.

William of Orange was often accused of being on the wrong side by both sides, and very much misunderstood. The King did not get it, or want to get it, but then neither did the people. Today 450 years later we still don’t get it.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the author of the Gulag Archipelage; in 1975 shortly after his expulsion from the Soviet Union, and about 20 years before the final collapse of the Soviet Union, had some warning for the west in his speeches.  When understood from hind sight, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, its message becomes increasing clear. I will quote from his Washington speech. It speaks for its self.

“There are two major processes occurring in the world….which has been in progress more than 30 years”.

“It is almost a joke now in the western world, in the 20th century, to use words like “good” and “evil” they have become almost old-fashioned concepts, but they are very real and genuine concepts. These are concepts from a sphere which is higher than us. And instead of getting involved in base petty, short-sighted political calculations and games we have to recognize that the concentration of World Evil and the tremendous force of hatred is there and it’s flowing from there throughout the world. And we have to stand up against it and not hasten to give to it, give to it, give to it, everything that it wants to swallow”….. hoping that at some point the wolf will have eaten enough.

“The second process is one which I consider the key to everything and which, I will say now, will bring all of us our future; under the cast-iron shell of communism – for 20 years in the Soviet Union and a shorter time in other Communist countries – there is occurring liberation of the human spirit. New  generations are growing up which are steadfast in their struggle with evil; which are not willing to accept unprincipled compromises; which prefer to lose everything – salary, conditions of existence and life itself – but are not willing to sacrifice conscience; not willing to make deals with evil.”

“This process has now gone so far that in the Soviet Union today, Marxism has fallen so low that it has become an anecdote, it’s simply an object of contempt. No serious person in our country today, not even university and high school students, can talk about Marxism without smiling, without laughing.”

From this quote by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, I think it is clear that he was yet expecting a police state military crackdown on the Soviet citizens.  As he said “I will say now, will bring all of us our future; under the cast-iron shell of communism”.  This did not happen instead the Soviet Union simply melted away.  The reformation was more successful than he had anticipated.  Obviously, it was Soviet Ideology that was destroyed, and then also the authorities’ will to enforce it. It seems they could no longer find sufficient co-operation, neither the spiritual will to enforce it.

Can we defeat the Ideological government and justice of the west with the same mode of action? I believe we have no choice; we need to act before it gets worse.  We do not need to fear the outcome; we know from history that objective truth will be vindicated; the moral imperative will always remain.   All that the Russian people did was defend objective truth without fear and resisted the subjective evil of communism.

We, the people of the world, need to defend objective truth in every place possible in the face of subjective evil, (moral relativism) without fear of the consequences.  Our enemy is already defeated and they know it. That is why the academic response in the west to people like myself often are obscenities and death threats. You do not need to be afraid of them.


When in the west, with our democracy, and developed economies, of these post revolution days of the twenty first century; we may think of ourselves as descendant of ancient Europe, the Greek democratic City states, and then upon reflection – we have chosen the very worst and rejected the very best.  We have embraced Greek pagan religion/Ideology and we have rejected Greek monetary democracy.

Then upon further reflection of the entire world, there are only two possibilities for Government. There are also only two possibilities for religion/ideology; this regardless of all cultural differences.  There is no third way; you may search all you like, you will never find a compromise as the third.

They are these; The Supremacy of God and the rule of law, and the other choice, the Supremacy of Man and the rule of tyranny.  The one is human beings as end in themselves, the other is human beings a means to an end.  The one is peace the other, constant war.

Choose this day who you will serve.

As for me and my house we will serve the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law.

When this is what I serve then what are my recommendations?  This can only be from a historic perspective, and not an Ideological. Then it is no longer a recommendation but history demands it.

They are three things, for all the people of the world.

1. The restoration of the Secular State Under the supremacy of God and the Rule of Law, which speaks for its self that Justice, would be objective; Human rights, civil rights, civil liberty, and human beings as ends in themselves.

When Ideological/religious judges, on the Supreme Court can bypass Parliament and rule by Ideological/religious decree; then we the people need a system whereby that  we can bypass Parliament and impeach these ideological/religious judges.  We need to put an end to this last vestige of absolutism.

2. The restoration of free enterprise, under the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law, which again is Human rights, Civil Rights, Civil Liberty, objective justice and the objective rule of law. Enterprise without this is not free enterprise but a regression to slavery and extreme poverty for the masses.

3. The restoration of the People’s Money. Public debt is owed by the people and also to the people as their own primary reserve money. The one cancels out the other. Public debt has no vale and its existence as debt is an illusion for the benefit of monetary imperialism.  The present monetary system of Quantitative Easing is social credit welfare for Capitalism, and will create tribute states as well as tsunamis of capital flows around the world, but no coherent local and regional economic development. That can only come through empowering the people with their own local capital (monetary

Caleb Maccabee


Restore Authentic Human Rights

To restore authentic human rights

Parents with children in their growing up years may have had them enrolled in swimming lessons; for some available through the school and others, through the community’s public swimming pool; as well some of our children may belong to a swim team. As recently as 1975 and prior thereto it was a common practice throughout North America to have nude swimming for these classes and teams, the sexes apart.  You probably don’t know about this because this is one of those things no one tells you. You can find it on line “history of boys swimming nude at the YMCA and Public Schools”.

Why did we do this; and why do we not do this today? There are two reasons for why we did this and 4 reasons why we now don’t.  The first reason, historically we have always swam nude, prior to swimming pools we swam in lakes rivers and ponds; one day for boys/men the next day for girls/women, or at different locations. We only wore bathing suits on mixed public beaches. This nudity was not sexualized. The second reason was hygiene; Swimming pools in those times were not the chemical composition as they are today. It was required to wash in a shower with soap before entering the pool and bathing suits were not allowed, they carried too much bacteria. The water in these pools was replaced every 10 to 14 days.

Should anyone today suggest we have nude swimming for our children, most parents would freak. It would be considered professional misconduct at the least, or even accused of being a sexual pervert, a pedophile; you would lose your job or even end up in jail.

What has changed since then that may have affected our attitude toward this, over these past 70 years? I will list them.

1. We have had a proliferation of pornography, from a time none were available to the saturation of today, and being a commercial product it is produced in a manner that intends to maximise addiction.

2 .The proliferation of movies, again from a time none were available; and a movie industry that seems to think every good movie needs a sex scene, and more recently that at least one actor identifies himself as the homosexual. Why would I want to watch this?  We don’t go to our neighbours to watch them that might get us in jail; but that is exactly what the movie industry thinks of us and that this is what we want to do. We are being hoaxed into becoming sexual perverts without even realizing it.  Then we may still think we have the moral high ground; and may not think like this about ourselves, but then we do for our neighbor. Pornography and public sex for entertainment affects everyone.

3. A rising epidemic of divorce, broken families, homosexuality and pedophilia; men seeking employment as coaches, teachers, and youth leaders for their alterative sexual purpose. This social phenomenon is nothing unlike the current rising epidemic of obesity. I cannot explain why these epidemics occur, we might find out, we might not, but we might consider that we ourselves may be the cause of them.  What shall we now do for obesity? Shall we have obesity pride? Or for that matter is there anything ells? Most of us can recognize the folly of pride; apparently our lawmakers don’t.

4. The sexual revolution, here in Canada in 1969 with Pierre Trudeau’s “just society” which is really the ideologicalization of our justice; Aided by public funded ideological social activism to speed up the process for the feminization of society to make sure that the sexual revolution would not fail; (A revolution with untold and growing casualties from HIV/AIDS).

It is for these reasons that nudity has become sexualized, and in a wider sense sexual trust for one another is lost. Today most parents are still protective of their children, but to what degree?  We now have a public school system with a curriculum that teaches homosexuality to children with role models.  (To teach a specific behaviour in the context of the objective human being is the same as to teach racism, they both rely on the same principle). Then, there is continual pressure to reduce the age of consent for sex with minors. Having in the background that pedophilia is only just another orientation, and then at times in our Roman history it was perfectly fine to have sex with children, at least for the pagan ruling elite.  It could never harm children, not in the ideology of moral relativism, who defend this as freedom of choice.

Now there is a new public nudity beginning to appear, nudity displayed on our streets in a sexual context such as gay pride. Is sexualized nudity now above the law or is there no law?  Are there now different laws for different people? In Canada it is illegal to be nude in a public place, or while on private property but exposed to public view. This law is circumvented for public protest such as the world naked bike ride and gay pride. Today if you want to be naked on the street you need to think of a protest to get the protection of the law.  I wonder who and what they are protesting? All human beings are equal but some human beings are more equal than others. Or is this a special law for the gods (naked Greek gods)?  Then to make the adaptation to George Orwell’s book “Animal Farm”, when pigs can walk on hind legs then surely some humans may walk as God.   I have searched the web to see if there is anything you might consider objective about these so-called protests; there is nothing, only, same sex celebration, including “queers against Israeli apartheid” and then sexualized entertainment and sexualized nudity.  I have heard from parents that their children are shocked when they first encounter gay pride.  It is our children that can recognize we are being idiots, but apparently not our law makers.

These so called protests are actually symbolic but effective ideological pogroms intended to kill intellectual objectiveness, render society confused, helpless, and defenceless in the face of the worship of sex, to prepare society for the next phase; an addiction that will never be satisfied. Gay pride is a lot more about getting off on the public for the success of moral relativism than it has anything to do with human equality.  It therefore is a pagan ideological celebration that has no place in the public sphere of a secular state.

Many mayors and councillors of our municipal governments are already skittish about gay pride, you need to take courage and stand up against ideology, don’t be intimidated by their threats neither the rulings of ideological judges, their threatening look much the same. You need to take the long view and history is on your side. We need to ban public endorsement for celebrations  subjective human behaviour.

Restoring True and objective Justice, and authentic human rights:

A person is a human being before he is homosexual, like wise a person is a human being before he is a race, or for that matter anything ells. To reveres this order is to create gods and demons. When a specific individual human trait or behaviour is being equated to be equal to the human being, it then requires a confession of faith from everyone concerning this, just to be a human being.  This only serves the purpose for persecution.  This also happens to be the apex of pagan religion and the complete opposition to the preamble of our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.  We have not seen the likes of this in the western world, not since the Third Reich.

Today, the ideology of moral relativism is using and encouraging homosexuality as a weapon of war to persecute human objectiveness; to destroy the moral imperative to our freedom.

The notion of separation between church and state has long ago been destroyed by the Courts; our Courts are very much in the business of religion as ideology, they are no longer Judges but have become our high priests.

A secular state has an obligation to its citizens to remain objective and be none ideological. When it is not, then neither it is secular.  Ideology which is the same as pagan religion has no place in a secular state. To put it there is a declaration of war against humanity.

A secular state can only exist under the supremacy of God and the rule of law, where all human beings are ends in themselves before God; The objective human being having reality independent of mind. Then to alter the objective human being, is to substitute the subjective for the human being, it then becomes the perceived human being. To do so is to destroy All justice, not just some of it, All of it, justice has then been replaced with an ideological curriculum.

When it requires a confession of faith just to be a human being, then it also follows only a human being can be a person and citizen, not Christians, not Jews, not intellectuals; critical thinking and objective thinking become the primary sin against the State, and academic freedom is apostasy. No freedom of conscience, no civil liberty. Today much of our civil service employment and public office now requires this confession of faith. You have already shut us out of this employment opportunity.  What are you doing different from what the Roman Catholic Church did to Jews in the Middle Ages, or for that matter Nationalist Germany? In time you will realize you have made us equal to your own unborn children whom you refuse to recognize as human beings and legally kill up until the time of birth.  We are now left begging the next question; when will we see the next holocaust? You have already laid the foundation and when we see a foundation, are we to believe the building will never be built? You need to remove this foundation because in time it will be removed.

When we of the west preach sermons to the world on same sex marriage, same sex parenting and gay pride, we drive the world farther away (including our own children) each to their own radical ways.  They can see that we have become intellectually and morally bankrupt and have become the same as our enemy.  We teach radicalism; and I may as well add, not only in social justice but in monetary justice and economic justice as well.

All of you ideological politicians, lawmakers and Judges, you may do what you think you can get away with, but you may know for certain History has already condemned you. All ideological states fail, they devour each other, and their own people, but a nation will survive the state.

Action Plan                            

We need people to get together in each municipality who are willing to take up this following petition and approach your local municipal government with it, and these arguments to support it. Write a press lease and invite the media, make it public. Write a blog for your municipality. Should they refuse; then also make that public. Buy advertising.  This is all symbolic but very effective in changing public opinion (you need to bring light to your neighbors, and remove the veil covering ideology). We also need to bring this into our Universities.

You might note this proclamation is also a defence against radical Islam. Moral relativism and radical Islam are the same; they both have the same common enemy “objective Truth”. The spirit of this proclamation is the only real alternative to ideological war; two good selling points for your municipality.

 The Mayors Proclamation

We the undersigned people of our community request our Mayor to make the following proclamation, to draw special consideration for the preamble to our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and all of its benefits for the equality of all human beings; and that with this proclamation, refuse all subjective and ideological proclamations.

“We affirm the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law; where all human beings are ends in themselves before God; where people are responsible and accountable for one another in accordance to objective nature, and free from all subjective coercion and not a means to an ideological end”.

The relationship between racism and moral relativism

Racism, segregation and apartheid have the primary intent to keep races apart and therefore they object to mixed race marriage. They believe their racist ideology is primary to natural human biology. Human biology becomes dependant on this racist ideology. This ideology gives credibility to the ideology of moral relativism and their same sex marriage and parenting. Now instead of racial preference, it is sexual preference that takes precedence and is primary to human biology; and then we are required to make a confession of faith denying biology and accepting ideology. I have never denied natural human biology for the benefit of racist ideology; neither will I ever deny human biology for the benefit of same sex ideology.

Then for a child to be a human being it requires a mother and father. That Child, then has a natural biological human right to a mother and father. To deny this, is slavery.

It is for these reasons that we can never accept racism, neither same sex marriage nor same sex parenting; and there is no possibility for freedom of conscience concerning this. To think there is, is the same, to say, “If you are against slavery then you don’t need to own slaves”.

A person is a human being before he is anything ells.

Obviously, this is all too radical, for our pagan ideological revivalists.


“The supremacy of God and the Rule of law where all human beings are ends in themselves before God; responsible and accountable for on another according to objective nature and free from all subjective coercion”, is the only human freedom, that will include all human beings.   I challenge you to find another.

This is the only freedom because it is the essence of true Religion, true Justice and true Government.  This should have been known and could have been known from the beginning of time. But in time it became known, for a nation, for religion, for justice, and government, through the Abrahamic Covenant, and its “blessing to all the families of the earth”. “God is one” One universal real God, then justice is one universal real objective justice, and ideology is idolatry.

Throughout all the ages of world’s history, successful democracies and human right have been very rare. The reason is there are only two choices for religion, justice and government; they are the Supremacy of God or the Supremacy of Man. Our modern democracies were only possible after the protestant reformation, and then primarily in states of the protestant nation. This nation is founded on the Abrahamic Covenant and its concept of universal objective justice. For once in history all of this came together.

For more than three thousand years the world has been killing the messenger; sacrificing the messenger. Anti-Semitism is anti-objectiveness; Anti-Semitism hates the Jew not for who he is but for what he stands for and represents in history; (objective justice in complete opposition to Ideological tyranny).  You can not kill God, neither objective justice but you can kill a Jew.

A true democracy with human rights survives only on the Universal objective Justice, are we now to think this justice has no enemies? It has one major enemy “the tyranny of creeping ideology;   “Ideological creep”.

How does this happen? I will show you by making it into a board game that even your children can understand.

First we need to collect all the assets and liabilities of the world together and put them into the proper accounts; these two accounts are, the supremacy of man and subjective Ideology as justice and the Supremacy of God and objective justice.

Supremacy of Man (subjective)              Supremacy of God (objective)The perceived human being                                       The real human being Perceived human rights                                                        Real human rights Tyranny                                                              Constitutional Gov. democracy Ideology                                                                                                         Civil Rights Propaganda                                                                                Academic Freedom Aggressive war                                                                                    Defensive war Isolationism                                                                              Community/Nation Promiscuity                                                                                    Marriage/Family Slavery                                                                                            Economic welfare Poverty                                                                                                   Social welfare Racism

Abortion/infanticide                                                                                                        Eugenics                                                                                                                              Genocide

Now that we have the inventory of the world’s assets and liabilities, in the proper columns the challenge is how much of the subjective can we insert into the objective by ideological creep, without having the objective collapse into anarchy, tyranny and civil war?  This then all depends on the quantity of items and the weight they carry, and as they enter in time they will replace the objective. The success also depends on the knowledge of the citizens.

Now in Canada how much of the subjective have we inserted into the objective by ideological creep and what is being replaced? Have we reached the tipping point? If so what is holding it back? And is it sustainable?

As of now January, 2015 the following is the list of ideological creep inserted successfully into Canada’s objective justice; the perceived human being, perceived human rights, ideology, propaganda, isolationism, promiscuity, abortion/infanticide, eugenics.  By far the one that carries the most weight is the designation of the “perceived human being”. It is a cover for all the rest introducing creeping erosion of the human being; it functions like a malignant cancer.

From the objective side the following is being  removed; the real human being, real human rights, civil rights, civil liberty, academic freedom, community, marriage/ family.

Now what is there left of the subjective that has not yet entered into the objective side? When will it also enter on the efforts of ideological creep? What is sustaining the present situation of the contradictory mix?  The greatest asset for ideological creep that sustains it is a population of people who are confused helpless and defenceless. The greatest enemy of ideological creep is critical thinking and objective thinking; then for ideological creep to have the total victory over objective justice requires eliminating the enemy; the intellectual, the Christian, the Jew.

It is time we had a major reformation, a revival and enlightenment to restore our objective Justice.  Surely our ideological priests and diviners will call any enlightenment, one more attempt at a Zionist conspiracy to take over the world, and If not Zionist, then they will call it religious fanaticism.  The greatest fear ideology has, is that human beings would actually have authentic freedom, in a civilized and prosperous society, (it is actually this that ideology sees as a conspiracy). Freedom makes ideology feel they have lost control, and have a need to do something that overpowers freedom for others. Then ideology may be a human deficiency disorder? And is this our Justice?

Freedom has a moral imperative to be Freedom.

Constitutional Democracy is the sovereignty of the people;

When the sovereign sleeps; Ideology creeps;

When the people awake; sovereignty is gone, all is gone.

Caleb Maccabee

Now who do I represent?

Civil Rights; and Citizens for the restoration of  objective Justice, the Real Human being and Real Human Rights, which is the only authentic secular state, and the only authentic human freedom.

Now if the veil is off and you can see the light; then help us build the nation and spend some money on the defence of our Justice; keep this campaign growing, send an email.  I have a lot more to write.  Moral relativism still receives government funding; I get nothing.

With the amount of quantitative easing from western central Banks you would think you and I would have a lot of money, but it is for capitalist world conquest, Ideological monetary policy, Ideological economic policy, and no objective justice; ( but this is another essay). We need to spend our money to survive this crisis, and restore our justice, socially and economically.

I am sorry if I have hurt anyone’s feelings, but I am a Historian, I do not change history and evidence to avoid hurt feelings.

Share this; send it around the world, build your own ideas and arguments, then use them.

Caleb Maccabee

calebmaccabee.com calebmaccabee@calebmaccabee.com                                                                                                                                           copyrights ,Caleb Maccabee,   All rights reserved